The New York Times has just written about some of its recent grammar and language gaffes--and the reporter managed to work "hot naked guys" into the piece. We firmly believe that many, if not all, discussions of language are improved thus. Your mileage may vary.
Update: Baal D. pointed out that women, according to the Times, actually want "not naked guys." Apparently we saw "hot" where they wrote "not." Freud might have a thing or two to say about that. At any rate, "not-naked guys" (which should have been hyphenated) are abundant. Are women really so easily pleased? We think...not.
Needless to say, we do not regret the error.